<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Spam Wars Dispatches</title>
<link>http://spamwars.com/</link>
<description></description>
<copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:43:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.121</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Another Banned URL Shortener</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The "The Business News" spammer who uses URL shortening services (noted <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/url_shorteners.html">here</a> and <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/more_on_the_url.html">here</a>) has shown me another shortening service that doesn't give a crap about spam abuse reports &mdash; even though they solicit such reports directly on their home page.</p>

<p>I am now adding hurl.ws to my destructo spam filters. It's too bad, because on the surface they look like they want to do the right thing. Moreover, the outfit appears to be run by bluespark.co.nz, a fellow iPhone app developer (yeah, that's sort of been my <a href="http://dannyg.com/iapps">day job</a> recently). They advertise the service thusly:</p>

<blockquote>
Hurl is a url shortening service with a difference, ....
</blockquote>

<p>I guess the difference is that they turn a deaf ear to abuse complaints.</p>

<p>In return, my email server turns a deaf ear to any email message (from a non-whitelisted sender) whose body contains a hurl.ws URL. What's Maori for "Adios, amigos"?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/07/another_banned.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/07/another_banned.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:43:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on the URL Shorteners</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Not all URL shorteners are created equal when it comes to handling abuse complaints. <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/url_shorteners.html">Yesterday's flood</a> continues. I went back to see how my abuse reports faired. Of the services I contacted, the only one that seems truly diligent about stomping out spam abuse of their service is is.gd. Four gold stars for them!</p>

<p>The one that looks to be the most problematic is kl.am, which appears to be run by a Tennessee "online marketing" firm called Sitening LLC. Unlike the responsive shorteners, kl.am does not have an abuse reporting link on their main page...or anywhere. Moreover, the main page is titled:</p>

<blockquote>
Shorten URL with URL Shortener for Internet Marketers
</blockquote>

<p>In other words, they seem to be encouraging the use of URL shorteners by commercial emailers. What a great way for a company to build an online brand presence&mdash;by hiding behind a URL shortener. WTF?</p>

<p>OTOH, it makes it easy for me to handle any company that takes advantage of this shortening service for spam purposes. From hereon, any email message body that contains a kl.am URL arriving from a non-whitelisted address goes straight to dev/null. See y'all!</p>

<p>(Tinyurl may be next.)</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/more_on_the_url.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/more_on_the_url.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:15:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>URL Shorteners in Spam</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Some "business opportunity" spammer has been flooding the intertubes with brief messages that use just about every URL shortening service on the planet, including several I had never before heard. Here is a sample of the source code of one of them sent from a pwned PC in Brazil (identifying bits [removed] or xx'd):</p>

<blockquote>
Received: from 189-19-xx-xxx.dsl.telesp.net.br (189-19-xx-xxx.dsl.telesp.net.br [189.19.xx.xxx]) by dannyg.com (8.12.11.20060614) id n5TEwPrW040161 for &lt;[removed]@dannyg.com&gt;; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:58:26 -0600 (MDT)<br />
Message-ID: &lt;4A48D688.1018475@{$FROMDOMAIN$}&gt;<br />
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:58:16 GMT
From: Stephanie &lt;StephanieLoyd36@{$FROMDOMAIN$}&gt;<br />
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)<br />
MIME-Version: 1.0<br />
To: &lt;[removed]@dannyg.com&gt;<br />
Subject: Online Jobs : The Next Goldrush?<br />
Content-Type: text/plain<br />
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit<br />
X-UIDL: 2&j!!~ai"!RaD!!)[8"!<br />

<p>Someone wants to share this news article with you:<br />
http://xx.xx/11Zk</p>

<p>User Comment:<br />
im pretty motivated after seeing this..what do you think?</p>

<p>Source: The Business News<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>I've filed half a dozen abuse complaints to the URL shortening services in the last 12 hours in the hope that the offending URLs will be shut down quickly. Of the shortening service Terms of Service that I've read, none of them permit using their domains as spam destination halfway houses.</p>

<p>Note, by the way, how the botnet software fails to mail merge a bogus domain name into the Message-ID: and From: header field placeholders.</p>

<p>The shortened URLs lead to a domain that claims to be registered by someone in China and has been alive for about a week. Ah, if only China would shift its internet blockage infrastructure into reverse....</p>

<p>So, I guess I'll keep playing whack-a-mole until one of us gets bored. Hint:it won't be me.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/url_shorteners.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/url_shorteners.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:30:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Item Followups</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm going to combine updates of two different items in this posting. One is kinda funny, the other not at all. I'll deal with the unfunny one first.</p>

<p>In <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/how_to_piss_off.html">yesterday's post</a>, I talked about a malware-looking ecard spam message that led to a medz spamming page. The campaign continues, but the URLs are now leading to an executable PC file (.exe) that is pure malware.</p>

<p>What interests me most about this is that for the past few years, I've seen plenty of evidence that the originators of many malware lures and the so-called Canadian Pharmacy medz (and other) spam are one in the same. "They" mail to the same lists (which include some of my spamtrap addresses), and there is a similarity to their campaign tactics. I think the medz link in yesterday's email was a glitch in their system, and it only added more to the argument that this medz/sex/knockoffs spam gang is actively involved in building botnets and stealing private information (e.g., trojans that steal password credentials).</p>

<p>I'd like to think that if those who buy from the spammers knew they were funding malware development and distribution activity, they'd think twice. But that's like saying a heroin addict who learns where  poppy plants are grown would care about funding the Taliban.</p>

<p>For part two of this update, I remind you of the posting about a <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/time_to_slap_a.html">419er who exposes 400 email addresses</a> in his "You've won an award!" spam. I just saw a spam message from a 419er who indavertently acknowledges he's not smart enough to figure out how to disguise recipient email addresses as blind copies (BCC). But he <em>is</em> aware that the To: addresses are open for viewing:</p>

<blockquote>
From: MARSHALL CHI<br />
Subject: HI <br />

<p>the nigeria government is given $35,million us$ contract payment for<br />
2010 africa world cup to 80 lucky people, all the 80 emails are will<br />
shown please cross check to see if you can see your email if you do<br />
please kindly fill this form below.</p>

<p>1, your full name <br />
2, your phone number <br />
3, your country <br />
4, your sex <br />
5, your age <br />
6, your home address <br />
7, your occupation <br />
8, your international passport</p>

<p>please reply to this email address below</p>

<p>[removed]@hotmail.com<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Isn't it odd that the 80 lucky people all have email addresses that start with the same two letters? This guy has a way to go before he understands how to send his blocks of spam to a randomized list of rented addresses if he intends to expose them. Oh, and he also needs to learn how to count because the contiguous block of addresses in the message I received contained 90 addresses, not 80.</p>

<p>Bad 419er! Go sit in the corner.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/item_followups.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/item_followups.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:17:34 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>How to Piss Off Your Potential Customers</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>If you've ever read much about marketing, you've probably heard the expression "underpromise and overdeliver" as a way to impress customers with more than they thought they'd receive. I just saw a spam message that exercises a corollary to that old expression: "overpromise and deliver squat."</p>

<p>Here's the message:</p>

<blockquote>
Subject: You've received a greeting ecard

<p>Good day.<br />
You have received an eCard</p>

<p>To pick up your eCard, choose from any of the following options:<br />
Click on the following link (or copy & paste it into your web browser):</p>

<p>http://[removed]view.com/</p>

<p>Your card will be aviailable for pick-up beginning for the next 30 days.<br />
Please be sure to view your eCard before the days are up!</p>

<p>We hope you enjoy you eCard.</p>

<p>Thank You!<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>If you've been monitoring the spam business as long as I have, the first conclusion jump is that the destination URL is a drive-by malware installation web site. Seen it a gazillion times before.</p>

<p>But if you're an unsuspecting email user, you likely believe that there is an ecard from an unknown admirer at the end of that link. Oh, goody goody!</p>

<p>You click.</p>

<p>And what do you see? Why none other than the spam defender's worst nightmare:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch06_27_09.jpg" alt="Canadian Pharmacy logo" />
</blockquote>

<p>So much for your secret admirer. Buy some fake Viagra instead.</p>

<p>I may not be the world's best businessperson, but I know enough not to aggravate your customers when they come through the door and make them feel like stupid asses for having entered.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/how_to_piss_off.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/how_to_piss_off.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:36:21 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bogus Microsoft Outlook Update Email</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is an email claiming to come from Microsoft alerting Outlook and Outlook Express users to a supposed update:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch06_22_09.jpg" alt="Phony Microsoft Outlook update email" />
</blockquote>

<p>This is a variation on the malware delivery email reported a few days ago by <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/sophoslabs/v/post/4889">Sophos</a> (and others), but this time the email doesn't carry an attachment, just a link. The link actually goes to a new site whose domain was registered waaay back earlier today. The destination page includes an iframe whose contents do the dirty work of pwning your PC.</p>

<p>Remember: Microsoft does not send out emails about critical updates. Use only the built-in Software Update mechanisms within Windows (and hope like hell your PC hasn't been previously taken over).</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE</strong> 23 June 2009: The "Date Published" field of the message increments with the date on which the email message was sent. Also, the long number assigned to the "id" attribute in both the fake and real URLs change with each email.</p>

<p><strong>UPDATE</strong> 23 June 2009 (#2): These emails have turned into a flood being sent from compromised PCs on most continents and using email addresses that included harvested spamtrap addresses &mdash; commonly recipients of medz and sex spam when the botnet recruitment efforts diminish.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/bogus_microsoft.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/bogus_microsoft.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:41:52 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clueless Botnet Users</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For the past couple of weeks I've seen the following types of messages come through:</p>

<blockquote>
Subject: Thank you! Your Order will be shipped within 24 hrs<br />

<p>Thank You!</p>

<p>Your Order Has been Processed and Will Leave our Warehouse in 24 Hrs!</p>

<p>Order Refrence ID: {%MIXED%}{%MIXED%}-{%MIXED%}{%MIXED%}{%MIXED%}{%MIXED%}{%MIXED%}{%MIXED%}</p>

<p>Please Visit  http://[removed].com</p>

<p>---<br />
Sincerely *Order/Processing Dept*<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>All those "{%MIXED%}" strings are placeholders for the botnet software to insert randomized numbers or letters to generate a so-called "Order Refrence [sic] ID". The stupid medz spammer hasn't figured out how to get the mail merge feature of his rented botnet to work.</p>

<p>Unfortunately that probably doesn't stop a lot of recipients from clicking the link in their haste to protest an order they didn't place (and isn't leaving any warehouse in any case). Sadly, and despite the snafu, enough newbie recipients will probably click the link anyway, and tick the hit counter of the spammer's web site. ROTFC[rying].</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/clueless_botnet.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/clueless_botnet.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:13:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>419er Chutzpah</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The height of criminal impudence is when a crook claims to be saving the impending victim from the very crime about to be committed. For example, malware distributor advertisements display false alerts about one's PC being infected so that the victim will install the <em>real</em> malware in the belief that they're cleaning their machines. And then we have advance-fee scammers (aka 419ers) who use words as their primary weapons, leaving plenty of opportunity for them to practice this type of audacity while twisting the minds of their email recipients.</p>

<p>Arriving today was a missive claiming to come from the United Nations. The message starts off with some impressive-looking images:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch06_21_09.jpg" alt="Phony United Nations email art" />
</blockquote>

<p>Then comes the message that essentially claims to offer the recipient $650,000 as compensation for having been scammed in any number of ways:</p>

<blockquote>
Attn: Sir/Madam, 

<p></p>

<p><br />
Note! after series of meeting that lasted for three (3) Months with the secretary General of the UNITED NATION. You fall on the names submitted to receive a United Nation Compensation. This goes to all the people that have been scammed in any part of the world, the UNITED NATION have agreed to compensate them with the sum of US$650,000.00 (Six Hundred And Fifty Thousand United States Dollars) This includes every foreign contractors that may have not received their contract sum, and people that have had an unfinished transaction or international businesses that failed due to Government problems etc.</p>

<p>Your name and email was in the list submitted by our Monitoring Team of Economic and Financial Crime Commission Observers (EFCCO) and this is why we are contacting you, this have been agreed upon and have been signed. You are advised to contact Mr. Sam  Daws, as he is our appointed person for payment endorsement, contact him immediately for your International Bank Draft of USD$650,000.00 (Six Hundred And Fifty Thousand United States Dollars) This funds are pay-able in handy collection for security purpose, Therefore, you should send him your full Name and telephone number/your correct mailing address for dully processing of your claims.</p>

<p> <br />
Person to Contact: Mr. Sam Daws<br />
Email: samdaws.[removed]@gawab.com<br />
Phone No: +44[removed]<br />
Country: United Kingdom.</p>

<p><br />
 </p>

<p> <br />
Good luck and kind regards,</p>

<p>Mrs. Inga-Britt Ahlenius.<br />
 <br />
[United Nations Seal image]<br />
 </p>

<p>Auditor General of Kosovo (United Nation )<br />
Making the world a better place<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Although the forged From: address of the email says it's from unitednation.org (a parked domain, and not the official un.org), the gawab.com return address where victims are to begin their path toward financial ruin is a free hosting service in Saudi Arabia. Very run-of-the-mill scam bait tactics there.</p>

<p>419ers have invoked the United Nations frequently before. The U.N. is a good target because it has a feel-good vibe about it in recipients' minds (well, unless you're from North Korea I suppose), and the organization won't bother to pursue these dime store crooks for abusing a good name. But all that this 419er needs is for one sucker to get caught up in wiring money to cover various fees, documents, and taxes in order to free the (non-existent) $650K. A few grand will make the scam pay off and help fund the next round.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/419er_chutzpah.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/419er_chutzpah.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:55:10 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Time to Slap a Wannabe Crook</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>My friends will tell you that by my very nature, I dislike violence. But when an emailing crook not only plans to rip off innocent victims <strong>and</strong> he wastes everybody's time (including his own) by being stupid, I just want to grab the guy by his necktie and give him a good slap across the face. It would be meant as a deterrent to not try this again.</p>

<p>What triggered my violent side today was <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/bogus_lottery_s.html">yet another</a> 419er with a lottery, or rather "award", winning announcement that stupidly exposes 400 recipient email addresses in the message (apparently a magic number for 419ers). There was also a glitch in his botnet that caused more than three-fourths of the list to <em>appear in the body of the message</em>. </p>

<p>The letter from "Mr. Stafan Smith" opens:</p>

<blockquote>
Dear esteemed recipient,
</blockquote>

<p>That's in the singular. What are my 399 co-recipients supposed to think? Does that mean that <em>all 400 of us</em> share the same "winning code"? (Sshh! It's 09PAD.) I'm not splitting the $2 million 400 ways. No way, dude!</p>

<p>How did I/we qualify for this award?</p>

<blockquote>
You have been selected due to the fact that you have sent more than 3 txts/email messages in 2months
</blockquote>

<p>Let me at 'im!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/time_to_slap_a.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/time_to_slap_a.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:25:55 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lame (and Phony) Microsoft Lottery</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Advance-fee (aka 419) crooks never stop. Microsoft's name has been used in the past for lotteries, so it's not unexpected to see their brand so brazenly hijacked for this latest tall tale:</p>

<blockquote>
From: "Microsoft Corporation"&lt;freewebprize@microsoft.com&gt;<br />
Subject: Microsoft EU Email Program..Your Email Won!

<p><br />
***********************************DO NOT DELETE THIS MESSAGE*****************</p>

<p></p>

<p>MICROSOFT CORPORATION<br />
EU INTERNATIONAL<br />
EMAIL PROGRAM<br />
P.O.BOX 7213<br />
UTRECHT.<br />
Tel: +31  [removed] 293 565<br />
Fax: +31  [removed] 446 952</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
Microsoft Corporation wishes to congratulate you for being one of the lucky<br />
winners in this season's email cash award program. With the introduction of<br />
new types of games, with the ushering in of on-line technology and with the<br />
permits issued under EU law to EU countries to compete for concessions to<br />
run games on the internet, we are launching our first international<br />
promotion.<br />
This is an independent promotion and is unconnected to any publication. <br />
No purchase necessary. Be informed that this lottery promotion was conducted<br />
through the Internet worldwide random selection, we are running a program<br />
where instead of bought tickets and numbers in the ballots we use email<br />
addresses. All contestants were selected through a computer ballot system<br />
drawn from email addresses taken from all over the world. <br />
the participants and winners where picked randomly through a computer ballot<br />
system and your email address have been selected as one of the lucky winners. </p>

<p>Your email have been officially selected as a winner and authorised for<br />
claim in the 2nd category winning prize of One Million Five Hundred<br />
Thousand Euros.</p>

<p>For payment of your winning prize outlined herein are the terms and<br />
conditions for claims and onward transfer: </p>

<p>1. You must be over the age of 18. </p>

<p>2. All winnings is Guaranteed and Insured.</p>

<p>3. Form below must be properly filled out. </p>

<p>4. Choose Mode of Payment (Bank wire Transfer / Bank Cheque)</p>

<p>5a.Winner is responsible for notarization fees and cost of transfer charges: <br />
Due to the Insurance Bond Policy on your winning prize,<br />
of which your winning prize must reflect exact winning prize on your nominated mode of payment.<br />
(Bank Wire Transfer/ Bank Cheque) to avoid complications.</p>

<p>6. The notarization of your winning certificate completes the<br />
claim process, failure to do so will make you to forfeit the prize. </p>

<p>7. Any leak of your winning information resulting in a double claim, will<br />
nullify your winnings. </p>

<p>8. You are obliged to have your name published as a winner and will be<br />
invited to be present in the t.v.show after remittance. </p>

<p>9. To be eligible for claim you must complete the claims process before the<br />
expiry date stated in this winning notification you received. </p>

<p>10. Filing a claim means acceptance of the full terms and conditions of<br />
Micrsoft Corporation. </p>

<p></p>

<p>If you agree to the terms and conditions for claim and onward transfer of your winning prize,<br />
send your details and reference below to the Public Relations Officer below that you agree to the terms and conditions of <br />
Microsoft Corporation and that you wish to claim your winning prize for onward transfer.</p>

<p><br />
CONTACT:<br />
MICROSOFT WEB<br />
P.R.O<br />
BOUWMAN WODERICK (MR).<br />
Tel: +31  [removed] 293 565<br />
Fax: +31  [removed] 446 952<br />
Email: [removed]@WEB.NL</p>

<p></p>

<p>Send the following to the Public Relations Manager above by email or fax: </p>

<p>Coupon Number: 378-059-132<br />
Reference Number:  WIN/83470/XEU<br />
Full Name:<br />
Date of Birth:<br />
Occupation:<br />
Address:<br />
Country:<br />
Telephone:<br />
Email:<br />
Winning Prize:<br />
Proof of identity:</p>

<p>Send your details by fax if you find it difficult sending an email.</p>

<p><br />
Any leakage of this winning notification leading in a double claim will<br />
makes you to forfeit your prize this is part of our security protocol,<br />
thus we advise you to keep this winni</p>

<p>KEEP THIS WINNING NOTIFICATION AWAY FROM PUBLIC NOTICE UNTIL AFTER TRANSFER.ng notification message confidential <br />
away from public notice to prevent double claims and impersonation until after <br />
remittance/payment to you. </p>

<p>Note: Claim expiry date is 17-06-2009. After this date all winning prizes will be filed <br />
as unclaimed.</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
Congratulations once more from all members of staff.</p>

<p><br />
Management,</p>

<p>Magaret Kexter.<br />
(Co-Ordinator)<br />
Microsoft Corporation.</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
NOTICE: This message, including all attachments transmitted with it, is for<br />
the use of the addressee only. <br />
It may contain proprietary, confidential and/or legally privileged<br />
information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any<br />
mistransmission. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not,<br />
directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print or copy any part of<br />
this message. If you believe you have received this message in error, please<br />
delete it and all copies of it from your system and notify the sender<br />
immediately by reply e-mail.</p>

<p><br />
© 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of use. Privacy Statement<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Even if, in your greediest moment, you bought into the notion of winning money from the billions stashed away in Microsoft cash on hand, there is one telltale sign that this offer is bogus: The return email address is not to a Microsoft entity. Microsoft (who, incidentally, would know how to spell "Microsoft" consistently throughout an email message -- see No. 10 above) would never rely on Nederland Online (web.nl) for a return email address.</p>

<p>Notice, too, that these crooks are pre-lubricating the shafting they're going to inflict on anyone who falls for the bait:</p>

<blockquote>
5a.Winner is responsible for notarization fees and cost of transfer charges: 
Due to the Insurance Bond Policy on your winning prize,
of which your winning prize must reflect exact winning prize on your nominated mode of payment.
(Bank Wire Transfer/ Bank Cheque) to avoid complications.
</blockquote>

<p>That gets the recipient ready to fork over some up-front dough in anticipation of a big payday. It will start with a request for a few hundred dollars to be wired somewhere exotic, but eventually escalate to thousands or more. The only TV show any sucker will be on (see No. 8 above) is one of those investigative shows that lets repentant suckers tell their tales of woe at having been bilked out of their retirement savings.</p>

<p>Why don't these guys come up with something more believable...like Steve Ballmer personally handing your winnings to you as a bushel of cash?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/lame_and_phony.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/lame_and_phony.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:22:03 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Work From Home! Go to Jail!</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>An unsolicited email message finds its way into your inbox offering the prospect of an easy job "processing payments" for an international company that needs an agent in "your area" (wherever you live). I've even seen some offers abusing brand names such as Federal Express in the mix. All you need is a computer (Duh, you have email!) and a bank account.</p>

<p>If you bite for this trick, you'll soon be setup as a money mule, laundering funds lifted from stolen bank and investment accounts. The accounts were hijacked through your employer's surreptitious installation of Trojan software that grabs login keystrokes (usernames and passwords) to financial institutions. Of course, that happens in an entirely other "department," so you're not aware of that part of the business.</p>

<p>The "job" actually pays well in that you keep a sizable share of the funds deposited in your account, while you wire the rest to your "boss" in another country. Little work. Big rewards.</p>

<p>Oh, did I mention the risk? Ah, you see this "job" is totally illegal in the United States. Just having the stolen money deposited into your account is a crime. Passing it onward only adds to the offenses.</p>

<p>According to <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/05/money_mule_cops_plea/">The Register</a>, New Hampshire resident Alexey Mineev got caught up in one of these schemes and pleaded guilty to money laundering. He's having to cough up nearly $112,000 that the Feds observed him skimming over 16 months, and he may also spend time at the Graybar Hotel.</p>

<p>And you thought <em>your</em> job sucked!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/work_from_home.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/06/work_from_home.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:11:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Malware Keeps Coming</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>North Carolina State University computers <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/jessica_would_l.html">are still at it</a>, this time with yet a different brand name ploy. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Amazon.com:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch05_26_09c.jpg" alt="Fake amazon.com notice" />
</blockquote>

<p>This one is disguised as a shipping update notification. I get legitimate ones of these now and again from Amazon.com, but the real ones never contain an attachment. The attachment, Shipping document.zip, drew the same 25% VirusTotal score as the hi5.com attachment (including identical malware identifications, but different hash values).</p>

<p>Add a fake Twitter invitation to the mix now ("Subject: Your friend invited you to twitter!"). I think I'll give it a rest.</p>

<p>Time to pull the plug on ncsu.edu?</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/the_malware_kee.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/the_malware_kee.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:57:42 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Jessica Would Like You To Pwn You</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>It doesn't get the kind of media attention of places like Facebook, but another social networking site, hi5, is supposedly fairly popular (if I can ascribe any fact to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi5_(website)">Wikipedia entry</a>). Frankly, the name didn't ring any bells with me, but then again, I'm more of an antisocial networker.</p>

<p>In any case, alarm bells did go off in my head when I received an unsolicited message claiming to come from hi5.com, suggesting that "Subject: Jessica would like to be your friend on hi5!". The message looked like this:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch05_26_09.jpg" alt="Fake hi5.com invitation" />
</blockquote>

<p>In case you can't read the fine print, the body of the message reads thusly:</p>

<blockquote>
I set up a hi5 profile and I want to add you as a friend so we can share pictures and start building our network. First see your invitation card I attached! Once you join, you will have a chance to create a profile, share pictures, and find friends.
</blockquote>

<p>I suppose if I had been a hi5 member, the layout of the message would have looked familiar (it looks like hi5's home page), and I might have taken the email as being from another hi5 member. But, as is often the case with ne'er-do-wells, the author of this message screwed up in a couple of ways that wouldn't fool the spam-educated.</p>

<p>First, the links in the header and footer bars were ripped from a local copy of the web site's home page. As a result, the URLs for all of those links point to local URLs, not the hi5.com site. A roll over any of those URLs produces a variety of odd results, depending on your operating system. In any case, none of those URLs resolve to anything.</p>

<p>Second, although the From: field claims to be "invitations@hi5.com," the message header shows my copy to have originated from a computer connected to the North Carolina State University network. Probably some student or faculty member whose machine is well-pwned in its own right.</p>

<p>And, finally, the use of an attached payload masquerading as an invitation card to a social networking site is just too bizarre. Businesses built around web sites want to get you to the web site ASAP. Passing the attached file, Invitation Card.zip, through VirusTotal yielded a sad 25% catch rate based on signature. Those 25% (missing some big AV names, mind you) identify the file as a Trojan or other type of malware.</p>

<p>At roughly the same time, another malware delivery arrived, this time claiming to be from hallmark.com:</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch05_26_09b.jpg" alt="Fake Hallmark e-card" />
</blockquote>

<p>The Postcard.zip file was an entirely different piece of junk, recognized by a lowly 27.5% of the VirusTotal signature tests. This effort was sloppy in other respects. None of the supposed links were links at all. Also, the author of the body isn't very clear about the "i before e" rule of English spelling.</p>

<p>More troubling in a way, however, is that the Hallmark fake came from the same NC State network as the hi5 fake, but from a different (and not neighboring) IP address. Looks like some university needs to do  outbound attachment filtering ASAP.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/jessica_would_l.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/jessica_would_l.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:43:23 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Now Health.com Being Joe Jobbed</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago it was Fairfax Digital (Australia) whose brand name was <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/fairfax_digital.html">dragged through the mud</a> by a medz huckster who spammed as a Fairfax impostor. Today, it's Health.com whose brand is the target of a medz spammer.</p>

<p>The message begins:</p>

<blockquote>
Welcome to Health.com

<p>You are now subscribed to the following email newsletter(s): Health's Top Stories<br />
</blockquote></p>

<p>Here's what the email message looks like (the large image with pills is downloaded from an external site):</p>

<blockquote>
<img src="http://spamwars.com/image/dispatch05_25_09.jpg" alt="Fake Health.com spam message" />
</blockquote>

<p>This spammer isn't quite as clever as the earlier one because he leaves the links to a Chinese web site in plain view, rather than hiding them in less transparent links. The Chinese domain was registered waaay back on Saturday. Other identification in the message, however, tries to make the recipient believe it comes from Florida. If you dare follow the links (risky unless you use bulletproof browsing), the destination (after a bit of redirection) claims to be the old faithful, Canadian Pharmacy&mdash;whatever that is.</p>

<p>Perhaps we are in for a stretch of medz (and other) spammers hijacking the good names of web companies in an effort to gain an ounce of credibility with recipients. The economy must be tough all over.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/now_healthcom_b.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/now_healthcom_b.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:03:11 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fairfax Digital Followup</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm posting this separate followup to my <a href="http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/fairfax_digital.html">earlier article</a> about the slew of spam claiming to come from Fairfax Digital. Based on the number of Google searches that have landed folks to my article, it's still a vexing problem.</p>

<p>As I suggested in my earlier piece, the emails which begin with:</p>

<blockquote>
Dear , <br />
Thank you for becoming a Fairfax Digital Member.
</blockquote>

<p>do not originate, nor are they connected with, the real Fairfax Digital firm in Australia. I have heard directly from a representative of the company, and I accept her word. There were too many signs behind the facade of the messages to suggest Fairfax Digital was responsible. In addition to the numerous pointers mentioned in my earlier posting, I should have also added that the corporate logo in the spam messages looks nothing like the company's current logo. Perhaps the criminal spammer is using an old hijacked design.</p>

<p>I know it's hard to undo a first impression. When that first impression consists of copious amounts of spam tied to a particular brand name, even thinking of that name might send the lip curling. In this case, at least, your curling would be misdirected. It's important not to take <em>any</em> unsolicited email message at face value. Sometimes the scam is intuitively obvious; other times it takes additional digging to get to the truth.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/fairfax_digital_1.html</link>
<guid>http://spamwars.com/archives/2009/05/fairfax_digital_1.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:59:35 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>